What is the primary architectural advantage of a Microprogrammed Control Unit over a Hardwired one?
Computer Knowledge ·Previously asked in SSC CGL 2025
View the full solved paper: SSC CGL 2025 Tier II (19 Jan 2026)
Question
What is the primary architectural advantage of a Microprogrammed Control Unit over a Hardwired one?
- A. Ease of instruction set updates (Correct answer)
- B. Faster execution speed
- C. Lower power consumption
- D. Reduced physical gate count
Correct Answer
Option A — Ease of instruction set updates
Detailed Solution & Explanation
The correct answer is Ease of instruction set updates.
Key Points
- A Microprogrammed Control Unit stores its control logic as microinstructions in control memory, so modifying or extending the instruction set means rewriting that microcode rather than redesigning hardware.
- That flexibility is its defining advantage.
- A Hardwired control unit implements the logic in fixed circuitry, which makes it faster, more compact and typically lower in power — so the other three options describe hardwired strengths, not microprogrammed ones.
Additional Information
- The trade-off maps onto processor design philosophy: CISC processors, with large and complex instruction sets, generally use microprogrammed control, while RISC processors with small regular instruction sets favour hardwired control for speed.
- Microprogramming was introduced by Maurice Wilkes in 1951.
- Because the microcode is stored, a design fault can sometimes be corrected by a firmware update rather than replacing silicon — a practical consequence of the same flexibility.
- The control unit and the ALU together with registers make up the CPU.
Topics covered: Control Unit Computer Architecture