Which of the following is most true in regard to stating the structure of logic found in the author's conclusion?
English Language & Comprehension ·Previously asked in SSC CGL 2025
View the full solved paper: SSC CGL 2025 Tier II (19 Jan 2026)
Passage
PASSAGE (Q96–Q100): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions based on the passage:
"Bank failures raise serious concerns about supervisory oversight." The case studies of Credit Suisse and Silicon Valley Bank highlight the deficiencies in supervisory supervision. In many instances, supervisors are hesitant to come into conflict with bank management when weaknesses are identified, preferring to do nothing rather than take corrective action at a point in time when key issues are building into a problem. Regulators must adopt an attitude change in which they place more emphasis on the results rather than the details. Overemphasis on trivial matters might lead regulators to overlook more fundamental issues, such as whether financial institutions have adequate capital in case of a shock. Regulating requirements must be simplified. Complex regulation requirements in relation to capital may overlook systemic risk in their approaches when stress tests result in activities gravitating towards less heavily regulated institutions in the non-bank sector. Improved supervisory and bank communications would promote better supervision as a tool for managing risk. Recommendations include being up front about supervisory goals, openness to change within the bank organization, and increased transparency in supervisory contracts as a way of promoting swift problem resolution. These would aid shareholders as well as the overall economy. In conclusion, rather than pursuing a micro-management strategy, a move towards a clearly defined regulation that supports positive incentives is what is needed to ensure that banks behave within frameworks that promote financial stability.
Question
Which of the following is most true in regard to stating the structure of logic found in the author's conclusion?
- A. It suggests that the responsibility for assurance should lie with organizations rather than with outsiders.
- B. It proposes that bank managers should be given more freedom in setting.
- C. It urges a transition from procedural pedantry towards a results-oriented strategic framework. (Correct answer)
- D. It suggests a complete deregulation of the banking system to promote a competitive world economy.
Correct Answer
Option C — It urges a transition from procedural pedantry towards a results-oriented strategic framework.
Detailed Solution & Explanation
The correct answer is It urges a transition from complex rules toward incentive-based supervision.
Key Points
- The passage builds toward a conclusion about how banks should be supervised, contrasting detailed prescriptive regulation with an approach relying on positive incentives.
- The logical structure is therefore a call for transition — away from complexity, toward a framework that makes prudent behaviour attractive to banks themselves.
- The distractors misstate that structure: it neither shifts all responsibility onto bank management nor advocates complete deregulation, both of which are stronger claims than the passage makes.
Additional Information
- Questions about the "structure of logic" ask what the argument does, not what it says — recommend, contrast, refute, qualify or concede.
- Note the difference between less complex regulation and less regulation; conflating the two is the trap in the deregulation option.
- Regulatory approaches are commonly divided into rules-based (detailed and prescriptive) and principles-based (outcome-focused), which is the distinction underlying this passage.
- A conclusion urging change usually appears in the final sentences, so read the end of the passage first for this question type.
Topics covered: Reading Comprehension Structure of Argument