Why are supervisors often slow to act when banks have problems?

English Language & Comprehension ·Previously asked in SSC CGL 2025

View the full solved paper: SSC CGL 2025 Tier II (19 Jan 2026)

Passage

PASSAGE (Q96–Q100): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions based on the passage:

"Bank failures raise serious concerns about supervisory oversight." The case studies of Credit Suisse and Silicon Valley Bank highlight the deficiencies in supervisory supervision. In many instances, supervisors are hesitant to come into conflict with bank management when weaknesses are identified, preferring to do nothing rather than take corrective action at a point in time when key issues are building into a problem. Regulators must adopt an attitude change in which they place more emphasis on the results rather than the details. Overemphasis on trivial matters might lead regulators to overlook more fundamental issues, such as whether financial institutions have adequate capital in case of a shock. Regulating requirements must be simplified. Complex regulation requirements in relation to capital may overlook systemic risk in their approaches when stress tests result in activities gravitating towards less heavily regulated institutions in the non-bank sector. Improved supervisory and bank communications would promote better supervision as a tool for managing risk. Recommendations include being up front about supervisory goals, openness to change within the bank organization, and increased transparency in supervisory contracts as a way of promoting swift problem resolution. These would aid shareholders as well as the overall economy. In conclusion, rather than pursuing a micro-management strategy, a move towards a clearly defined regulation that supports positive incentives is what is needed to ensure that banks behave within frameworks that promote financial stability.

Question

Why are supervisors often slow to act when banks have problems?

  1. A. They do not have the legal power to stop a financial crash.
  2. B. They prefer to avoid conflict instead of fixing risks early. (Correct answer)
  3. C. They are confused because modern bank rules are too simple.
  4. D. They use a secret strategy to keep their contracts private.

Correct Answer

Option B — They prefer to avoid conflict instead of fixing risks early.

Detailed Solution & Explanation

The correct answer is They prefer to avoid conflict.

Key Points

  • The passage attributes supervisory delay to reluctance to confront the institutions being supervised, rather than to any absence of authority.
  • The distinction matters: supervisors possess the legal powers but hesitate to use them, which is a behavioural constraint, not a legal one.
  • Option A inverts this by claiming they lack legal powers, and the remaining options substitute confusion or concealed strategy for the reluctance the passage names.

Additional Information

  • This reluctance is often called supervisory forbearance — postponing corrective action in the hope that conditions improve on their own.
  • Forbearance tends to worsen outcomes, since problems compound while action is deferred, which is why the passage treats it as a weakness.
  • The tendency is one argument for rules-based triggers that compel action automatically once thresholds are breached, removing discretion.
  • Where an option asserts a lack of power and the passage describes a lack of will, the two are not interchangeable — this is a frequently exploited distinction.

Topics covered: Reading Comprehension Detail